Thursday, 5 April 2018

Details about Prostate Cancer

What is prostate cancer?

Prostate cancer is cancer of prostate gland. The prostate gland is a walnut-sized gland present only in men, found in the pelvis below the bladder. The prostate gland wraps around the urethra (the tube through which urine exits the body) and lies in front of the rectum. The prostate gland secretes part of the liquid portion of the semen, or seminal fluid, which carries sperm made by the testes. The fluid is essential to reproduction.
Prostate cancer is one of the most common types of cancer that develops in men and is the third leading cause of cancer deaths in American men, behind lung cancer and colorectal cancer. In 2017, the American Cancer Society estimated that 161,360 men will be newly diagnosed with prostate cancer and 26,730 men will die from the disease -- though many of them had lived with the disease for years prior to their deaths.
Prostate cancer is comprised nearly always of adenocarcinoma cells -- cells that arise from glandular tissue. Cancer cells are named according to the organ in which they originate no matter where in the body we find such cells. Thus, if prostate cancer cells spread in the body to the bones, it is not then called bone cancer. It is prostate cancer metastatic to the bones. Metastasis the process of cancer spread through the blood or lymphatic system to other organs/areas throughout the body. Prostate cancer more commonly metastasizes to lymph nodes in the pelvis and to the bones.

What causes prostate cancer?

The exact causes of prostate cancer are not known. Several risk factors for developing prostate cancer have been identified, but which of these risk factors cause a prostate cell to become cancerous is not fully known. For a cancer to develop, changes must occur in the chemicals that make up the DNA, which makes up the genes in the cell. The genes control how the cell works, for example, how quickly the cell grows, divides into new cells, and dies, as well as correcting any mistakes that occur in the DNA of the cell to keep the cell working normally. Cancer occurs when certain genes that either control the growth or death of the cell are affected, which results in abnormal cell growth and/or death. Genes are inherited (passed on from parents to their children) and thus some changes in the genes (gene mutations) that increase the risk of developing cancer may be inherited. For prostate cancer, approximately 5%-10% of prostate cancers are due to inherited gene changes. Several inherited genes have been identified that increase the risk of prostate cancer, including RNASEL, BRCA 1, and BRCA 2, DNA mismatch genes, HPC1, and HoxB13. Gene changes may also be acquired (develop during the course of your life). These changes are not passed on to children. Such changes may occur when a cell is normally undergoing growth and division. It is thought that at times during normal cell growth, risk factors may affect the DNA of the cell.

What are the risk factors for prostate cancer?

Certain risk factors may predispose a person to prostate cancer. These include the following:
  • Age: Sixty percent of cases of prostate cancer arise in men over 65 years of age. The disease is rare in men under 40.
  • Race or ethnicity: African-American men and Jamaican men of African ancestry are diagnosed with prostate cancer more often than are men of other races and ethnicities. Asian and Hispanic men are less likely to develop prostate cancer than are non-Hispanic white males.
  • Family history: Prostate cancer can run in families. A man whose father or brother has or had prostate cancer is twice as likely to develop the disease. The younger the family member is when he is diagnosed with prostate cancer, the higher the risk is for male relatives to develop prostate cancer. The risk of developing prostate cancer also increases with the number of relatives affected.
  • Nationality: Prostate cancer is more common in North America, Europe (especially northwestern countries in Europe), the Caribbean, and Australia. It is less common in Asia, Africa, and South and Central America. Multiple factors, such as diet and lifestyle, may account for this.
  • Genetic factors: Mutations in a portion of the DNA called the BRCA2 gene can increase a man's risk of getting prostate cancer, as well as other cancers. This same mutation in female family members may increase their risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. However, very few cases of prostate cancer can be directly attributed to presently identifiable genetic changes. Other inherited genes associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer include RNASEL, BRCA 1, DNA mismatch genes, HPC1, and HoxB13.
  • Other factors: Diets high in red meats and fatty foods and low in fruits and vegetables appear to be associated with a higher risk of developing prostate cancer. Obesity is also linked to a higher risk of the disease. Increased calcium intake and dairy foods may increase the risk of prostate cancer.
Smoking, a history of sexually transmitted disease, a history of prostatitis (inflammation of the prostate), and a history of vasectomy have not been proven to play a role in causing prostate cancer. The role of fish oil in risk of prostate cancer remains under investigation.

What are the signs and symptoms of prostate cancer?


A patient with early prostate cancer is usually asymptomatic. However, late stage disease and sometimes early stage disease may have the following signs and symptoms:

  • Frequent urination, during the day and/or at night
  • Difficulty in starting (hesitancy), maintaining, or stopping the urine stream
  • A weak or interrupted urine stream
  • Straining to urinate
  • Inability to urinate (urinary retention)
  • Loss of control of urination
  • Difficulty urinating when standing, requiring sitting during urination
  • Pain with urination or ejaculation
  • Blood in the urine or in the semen
  • Abnormal rectal examination
Many symptoms of early cancer of the prostate can also be attributed to benign (noncancerous) conditions of the prostate, including benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), or infection in the prostate gland or urinary system.
Signs and symptoms of advanced prostate cancer (late stage prostate cancer) that has already spread from the prostate gland to elsewhere in the body (called metastatic prostate cancer) include
  • a new dull, then progressively severe, pain in the bones, especially the low back;
  • unexplained weight loss;
  • fatigue;
  • increasing shortness of breath while doing activities previously well tolerated;
  • low-impact fracture of bone(s) without a lot of trauma (or broken bone[s] from minor trauma); and
  • swelling of the legs related to obstruction of the lymph tissue by prostate cancer.
It is always best to find and diagnose prostate cancer at an early stage and hopefully still confined to its site of origin. At that point, treatments can cure it. When prostate cancer is widespread or metastatic, it can be treated, but it cannot be cured.

What specialists identify and treat prostate cancer?

There are several different types of specialists involved in the identification and treatment of prostate cancer.
  1. The primary provider (PCP) may be the initial medical doctor to discuss prostate cancer screening and/or become concerned about the risk of prostate cancer (because of abnormal rectal examination and/or elevated PSA or family history of prostate cancer [brother or father or multiple family members diagnosed with prostate cancer at < 60 years of age]) during your routine evaluations or due to symptoms and refer you to a urologist for further evaluation.
  2. Urologists are the specialists who will initially be involved in the diagnosis of prostate cancer and will perform the prostate biopsy. Depending on the grade and stage of the prostate cancer at the time of the diagnosis, additional specialists may be involved in your care. Urologists perform surgical-based treatments for prostate cancer (radical prostatectomy), minimally invasive treatments (cryotherapybrachytherapy), and prescribe medications (hormonal therapy).
  3. Medical oncologists are medical doctors who specialize in the treatment of cancer. Medical oncologists treat prostate cancer with a variety of medical therapies, including chemotherapy, immune/vaccine, and hormonal therapy.
  4. Radiation oncologists are specialists who treat cancer with ionizing radiation. This radiation may be given externally (external beam radiation therapy) or internally through the placement of small radioactive pellets into the prostate (brachytherapy).
  5. Often urologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists work together in a multidisciplinary team to review your case and you may meet with one, two, or all of these physicians at some point during your prostate cancer treatment.

What tests do health care professionals use to diagnose prostate cancer?


The diagnosis of prostate cancer ultimately is based on the pathologist's review of tissue removed at the time of the prostate biopsy. An abnormal PSA and/or abnormal digital rectal examination often are present and are the indications for the prostate biopsy.

Digital rectal examination (DRE): As part of a physical examination, your doctor inserts a gloved and lubricated finger into your rectum and feels toward the front of your body. The prostate gland is a walnut or larger sized gland immediately in front of the rectum, and beneath your bladder. The back portion of prostate gland can be felt in this manner. Findings on this exam are compared to notes about the patient's prior digital rectal examinations.
The exam is usually brief, and most find it uncomfortable due to the pressure used to adequately examine the prostate gland. Findings such as abnormal size, lumps, or nodules (hard areas within the prostate) may indicate prostate cancer.
The national comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) notes that a DRE should not be used as a stand-alone test for detection of prostate cancer but should be performed in men with an elevated PSA. The NCCN also notes that DRE may be considered as a baseline test in all patients, as it may help identify high-grade cancers associated with a normal PSA.
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood test: The PSA blood test measures the level of a protein found in the blood that is produced by the prostate gland and helps keep semen in liquid form. The PSA test can indicate an increased likelihood of prostate cancer if the PSA is at an increased or elevated level or has changed significantly over time, but it does not provide a definitive diagnosis. Prostate cancer can be found in patients with a low PSA level, but this occurs less than 20% of the time.
If the PSA level is elevated (levels can depend upon your age, on the size of your prostate gland on examination, certain medications you may be taking, or recent sexual activity) or has increased significantly over time, further testing may be needed to rule out prostate cancer.
PSA measurements are often tracked over time to look for evidence of a change. The amount of time it takes for the PSA level to increase is referred to as PSA velocity. The time it takes for the PSA to double, known as the PSA doubling time, can be also tracked. PSA velocity and PSA doubling time can help your doctor determine whether prostate cancer may be present.
The presence of an abnormal result on digital rectal examination, or a new or progressive abnormality in a PSA test may lead to a referral to a physician who specializes in diseases of the urinary system (a urologist) who may perform further testing, such as a biopsy of the prostate gland.
Prostate biopsy: A biopsy refers to a procedure that involves taking of a sample of tissue from an area in the body. Prostate cancer is only definitively diagnosed by finding cancer cells on a biopsy sample taken from the prostate gland.
The urologist may have you stop medications such as blood thinners (for example, warfarin[Coumadin]), aspirinibuprofen [AdvilMotrin], and certain herbal supplements) before the biopsy. An antibiotic is often prescribed to help prevent an infection related to the procedure. Some urologists may actually place a small swab into your rectum a week or so prior to the procedure to determine the best antibiotic to give you (selective target antibiotic prophylaxis). You may be asked to do a cleansing enema at home before the biopsy appointment and will be instructed to take the antibiotic 30 to 60 minutes prior to the biopsy to prevent an infection. On the day of the biopsy, the doctor will apply a local anesthetic by injection or topically as a gel inside the rectum over the area of prostate gland. You will be asked to lie on your side with your knees pulled up to your chest. Sometimes you may be asked to lie on your stomach. An ultrasound probe is then placed in the rectum. This device uses sound waves to take a picture of the prostate gland and helps guide the biopsy device. The device used is a spring-loaded needle that allows the urologist to remove tiny cores of tissue from the prostate gland. Usually, 12 cores are obtained, six from each side. Two cores are taken from the upper, middle, and lower portions of each side of the prostate gland. The cores are examined under the microscope by a pathologist (a doctor who specializes in examining tissues to make a diagnosis). Results may take several days.
If you do not have an anus (due to previous surgery), then transperineal prostate biopsy is performed. During this procedure, which is often performed under sedation, the biopsy needle is inserted through the perineum (area between the scrotum and the anus) into the prostate.
A biopsy procedure is usually uncomplicated, with just some numbness, pain, or tenderness in the area for a short time afterward. Occasionally, a patient has some blood in the urinestool, or the ejaculate after the procedure. Rarely, the patient may develop an infection after a biopsy procedure (urinary tract infection, prostate infection, testis infection) or be unable to urinate. If one develops a fever after the procedure, has continued blood in the urine or ejaculate, or has troubles urinating, further evaluation by the performing doctor is needed.

Prostate cancer biopsy results

The result of the pathologist's analysis of the biopsy cores under the microscope is the only way to diagnose prostate cancer. The prostate biopsy technique samples many areas of the prostate but rarely the biopsy can miss small areas of prostate cancer in the prostate. Thus, if the initial biopsy results are negative but the urologist is still suspicious based on the results of the examination, the ultrasound images seen during the procedure, or the PSA, additional biopsies or tests may be recommended.
The pathologist's report on the biopsy sample showing prostate cancer will contain much detailed information. The size of the biopsy core and the percentage of involvement of each core will be reported. Most importantly the prostate cancer present will be assigned a numerical score, which is usually expressed as a sum of two numbers (for example, 3 + 4) and is referred to as the Gleason Score. This characterizes the appearance of the cancer cells and helps predict its likely level of aggressiveness in the body. It is often also referred to as the grade of the prostate cancer.
A new prostate cancer grading system was developed in 2014 to help assess risk and assign a Gleason grade group. This grade group is particularly useful in Gleason score 7, where the predominant cell type could be a 4 or a 3, which may impact prostate cancer risk.
  • Gleason grade group 1: Gleason score < 6
  • Gleason grade group 2: Gleason score 3+4= 7
  • Gleason grade group 3: Gleason score 4+3 = 7
  • Gleason grade group 4: Gleason 4+4 =8, 3+5 = 8 and 5+3 = 8
  • Gleason grade group 5: Gleason score 9 and 10
The Gleason score and the extent of involvement of the biopsy core expressed as a percentage, as well as the PSA level as well as your general state of health and otherwise estimated life expectancy, all help to allow doctors to make their best recommendations for you regarding how your cancer should be treated.

Thursday, 17 August 2017

All You Need To Know About Swine Flu

What is swine flu?


Fast facts

  1. Swine flu was a pandemic in 2009 but is now considered another human flu virus.
  2. Swine flu can be prevented with the yearly flu vaccine.
  3. Swine flu has similar symptoms and treatments and is transmitted in the same ways as the regular flu virus.
Swine flu, also known as the H1N1 virus, is a relatively new strain of an influenza virus that causes symptoms similar to the regular flu. It originated in pigs but is spread primarily from person to person.
Swine flu made headlines in 2009 when it was first discovered in humans and became a pandemic. Pandemics are contagious diseases affecting people throughout the world or on multiple continents at the same time.
The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the H1N1 pandemic over in August 2010. Since then, the H1N1 virus has been known as a regular human flu virus. It continues to spread during flu season like other strains of the flu. The flu shot developed each year by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) usually includes a vaccination against a type of H1N1 virus.
Like other strains of the flu, H1N1 is highly contagious, allowing it to spread quickly from person to person. A simple sneeze can cause thousands of germs to spread through the air. The virus can linger on tables and surface areas like door knobs, waiting to be picked up.
The best means of dealing with swine flu is to prevent it. Hand sanitization is important to stop the spread of the virus. Staying away from infected people will help stop person-to-person transmission.
RISK FACTORS

Risk factors for swine flu

When it first emerged, swine flu was most common in children 5 years and older and young adults. This was unusual because most flu virus infections are a higher risk for complications in older adults or the very young. Today, risk factors for getting swine flu are the same as for any other strain of the flu. You’re most at risk if you spend time in an area with a large number of people who are infected with swine flu.
Some people are at higher risk for becoming seriously ill if they’re infected with swine flu. These groups include:
  • adults over age 65
  • children under 5 years old
  • young adults and children under age 19 who are receiving long-term aspirin (Bufferin) therapy
  • people with compromised immune systems (due to a disease such as AIDS)
  • pregnant women
  • people with chronic illnesses such as asthmaheart diseasediabetes mellitus, or neuromuscular disease
CAUSES

Causes of swine flu

Swine flu is caused by a strain of influenza virus that usually only infects pigs. Unlike typhus, which can be transmitted by lice or ticks, transmission usually occurs from person to person, not animal to person.
You can’t catch swine flu from eating properly cooked pork products.
Swine flu is very contagious. The disease is spread through saliva and mucus particles. People may spread it by:
        Treating swine flu

Most cases of swine flu don’t require medication for treatment. You don’t need to see a doctor unless you’re at risk for developing medical complications from the flu. You should focus on relieving your symptoms and preventing the spread of the H1N1 to other people.
Two antiviral drugs are recommended for treating swine flu: the oral drugs oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza). Because flu viruses can develop resistance to these drugs, they’re often reserved for people who are at high risk for complications from the flu. People who are otherwise generally healthy and get swine flu will be able to fight the infection on their own.

Swine flu symptom relief

     Methods for managing the symptoms of swine flu are similar to the regular flu:
  •    Get plenty of rest. This will help your immune system focus on fighting the infection.
  •    Drink plenty of water and other liquids to prevent dehydration. Soup and clear juices will help replenish your body of lost nutrients.
  •    Take over-the-counter pain relievers for symptoms such as headache and sore throat.
  • OUTLOOK

    Outlook for swine flu

    Severe cases of swine flu can be fatal. Most fatal cases occur in those with underlying chronic medical conditions, such as HIV or AIDS. The majority of people with swine flu recover and can anticipate a normal life expectancy.
    PREVENTION

    Preventing swine flu

    The best way to prevent swine flu is to get a yearly flu vaccination. Other easy ways to prevent swine fluinclude:
    • frequently washing hands with soap or hand sanitizer
    • not touching your nose, mouth, or eyes (The virus can survive on surfaces like telephones and tabletops.)
    • staying home from work or school if you’re ill
    • avoiding large gatherings when swine flu is in season
    It’s important to follow any public health recommendations regarding school closures or avoiding crowds during the flu season. These recommendations may come from the CDC, WHO, National Institutes of Health, or other governmental public health institutions.
    Flu season shifts from year to year, but in the United States it generally starts in October and runs until as late as May. It usually peaks in January, although it’s possible to get the flu any time of year.

Monday, 2 September 2013

MATERNAL AND FETAL OUTCOMES IN PREGNANCY INDUCED HYPERTENSION-A RETROSPECTIVE, OPEN LABELED STUDY

To find the maternal and foetal outcomes in Pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH).
Primary objective: To study the maternal and foetal outcomes in PIH.
Secondary objective:
* To compare these outcomes in primiparous and multiparous PIH women.
* To find prevalence of different types of PIH and to study their outcomes
Medical records of one year were reviewed. A total of 791 cases were present as per the medical records. Out of these, 245 cases had PIH.
Statistical methods: Chi square test was used to compare variables. Descriptive analyses were used to study maternal foetal outcomes.
Result: The commonly seen maternal outcomes were higher rates of caesarian section, maternal deaths and post partum hemorrhage in PIH women. The foetal outcomes were live births, still births, deaths, low birth weight and low APGAR scores. There was a strong association between maternal outcomes and parity. The rate of caesarian was higher in primiparous women. The association between foetal outcomes and parity was not statistically significant. Preeclampsia was the most common type of PIH and these women were more prone to hypertensive complications.
Conclusion: In the present study most commonly seen outcomes in PIH women were in agreement with data obtained from previous studies. Majority of PIH cases went for caesarean delivery in present study .Many studies conducted previously also showed similar outcome with increased rate of caesarian section. The incidence of PIH is higher in developing countries due to poor socio-economic condition.The common maternal complications were deaths, higher caesarian rates and foetal complications were still birth, deaths and low birth weights. Primiparous women were more prone to adverse outcomes. Preeclampsia was the most common type of PIH seen in present study.
COPY CODE SNIPPET
Introduction
Hypertension is disorder of Blood Pressure. A person is said to be hypertensive if the systolic BP is greater than 140 mm of Hg and diastolic BP is greater than 90mm of Hg. The exact etiology of hypertension is not known. A number of factors like Obesity, aging, stress, sedentary life style are said to play role in its etiology.Hypertension is seen even during pregnancy. This hypertension is said to be pregnancy induced. This is due to the stress during pregnancy. Pregnancy induced hypertension is one of the most common and dangerous disorder in mothers during pregnancy (1). Low serum calcium levels are found to play a vital role in etiology of PIH. Many opine that insulin resistance is involved in pathogenesis of PIH. Pregnancy induced hypertension is known to affect 5% of the pregnancies (2) . There are 3 clinical types of PIH. They are Preeclampsia, Eclampsia and Gestational hypertension (1).
Preeclampsia: It occurs in about 10% of primiparous women and in 5% of multiparous women. There is raise in BP at least twice with a time gap of 6 hours. (3)
Eclampsia: This is a condition where preeclampsia is accompanied by coma or convulsions. The incidence if eclampsia varies in different countries. The cause of convulsion is not known. (3).
Gestational hypertension (BP >140/90): This is a condition in which hypertension is seen only during pregnancy and blood pressure comes back to normal after delivery.(3)
Complications of PIH: Maternal complications (outcomes):
  • Higher rates of caesarian section
  • Maternal deaths
  • Post partum hemorrhage (3)
Fetal complications (outcomes):(1)
  • Intrauterine death
  • Asphyxia
  • Prematurity
  • low birth weight
Diagnosis: PIH can be diagnosed by any of the following examinations:
  • Urine test
  • Measuring blood pressure
  • Weight checks
There are many risk factors for PIH. It is very commonly seen in:
  • Primigravidae (4)
  • Women aged above 40
  • Women with high BP just before pregnancy
  • Genetic factors (2)
Treatment: The treatment of PIH depends on severity of disease, patient’s opinion, due date and also tolerance to antihypertensive drugs (6). Different treatment strategies followed are bed rest either at home or hospital and antihypertensive medications (5). Health care provider decides upon the treatment based on due date. There is a need for continuous maternal and foetal monitoring in PIH.
Prevention is always better than to cure. PIH can be prevented by exercising, proper Rest, proper diet, avoiding oily food, reducing intake of caffeine
The aim of this study was to find the maternal and foetal outcomes in PIH. The secondary aims were to compare these outcomes in primiparous and multiparous women. The prevalence and outcomes of different types of PIH was also studied.
Materials and methods
One year medical records of Obstetrics and Gynecology department were reviewed from May 2005 to April 2006 to find the PIH cases (1). The medical records reviewed had details of patients, their demographic data, age, gestational age, parity, obstetric history, diagnosis and outcome. It also had details of foetal sex, birth weight, APGAR scores at 1st and 5th minute, foetal outcomes. APGAR scores indicates activeness of newborns in terms of its respiratory rate, muscle tone etc. Primigravidae (primiparity) was defined as the first pregnancy. The subsequent pregnancies were called as multigravidae (multiparity). Gestational age was determined based on last menstrual cycle. Here new borns were classified as low birth weight cases based on definition of World Health Organization. As per World Health Organization’s definition new borns with low birth weight are those born with a weight less than 2500g(1). The outcomes in mother and foetus were studied. The complications were studied in both primiparous and multiparous women. All singleton pregnancies with mild or severe eclampsia, preeclampsia and gestational hypertension were included in study. All twin pregnancies were excluded. Prevalence of different types of PIH and their outcomes was studied separately. The age of the women in this study was ranging between 18 to 35 years in both the groups as per medical record. There was no variation in demographic and obstetric characteristics of women in both the parity group. The cases marked as hypertensive on record were included in the study.
Table: Population studied and control
AttributesTotal pregnant cases studiedPIH casesNon PIH cases
Number791245546
There were 794 pregnant cases present in the year 2005- 06 as per medical record. Out of these, 3 twin pregnancies were excluded. In remaining 791 cases, 245 cases had PIH as shown in table 1. The outcomes studied were type of delivery, death and post partum hemorrhage in mothers. The main outcomes studied in newborns were low birth weight, low APGAR scores, still birth and death. The complications were compared in primiparous and multiparous women. PIH was classified as Preeclampsia, Eclampsia and Gestational hypertension.
Parity and age distribution of women in both groups are represented in table and respectively
Parity distribution cases
Age distribution in PIH and non PIH
Statistical methods:
The data was stored in excel sheet. Statistician was approached for analysis of the data. Descriptive analysis was performed. Comparative analyses were performed using Chi square test to see the homogeneity of thequantitative variables. The student’s t test was used to compare the means of the quantitative variables. SPSS software 11.0 version was used for statistical analyses. The output generated was decoded and resultswere interpreted in the form of table or graphs.
Results
The most common maternal outcomes were aesarian, induced and normal deliveries. The majority of the PIH cases went for caesarian deliveries (46.1%), followed by normal (25.3%) deliveries and induced deliveries (15.9). Two maternal deaths were reported (0.816%).Two cases with post partum hemorrhage were reported (0.816%). The most commonly seen foetal outcomes were live births, stillbirths and deaths. The rate ofstillbirths and death were 18% and 4.1% respectively. 78% 0f the live births were seen in PIH cases. Other complications like Asphyxia, IUGR, foetal distress was seen .Asphyxia was seen in 1 case which died after some time. FD was seen in 7 births (2.9%), 2 of which died. IUGR was seen in 20 cases (8.2%).
The association between the parity and maternal outcomes are found to be statistically significant (P<0.05). The results of this study show that the rate of caesarian deliveries is 36.2% and 27.2% in primiparous than multiparous cases respectively. The rate of caesarian deliveries is comparatively higher in primiparous than multiparous cases. The rate of induced delivery was 20 and 22.7% in primiparous than multiparous cases. The rate of normal delivery was 43.8% and 50% respectively in primiparous than multiparous cases. Hence majority of the primiparous cases went for caesarian section. There were 2 maternal deaths (1.48%) and two cases of PPH (1.48%) reported in primiparous women.
There is no association between foetal outcomes and parity. (P>0.05) .The rate of still births in primiparous and multiparous cases was 9.6% and 11.8% respectively. The death rates were 5.3% and 5.5% in primiparous and multiparous cases respectively. Here there is no much difference in rates of foetal complications in primiparous and multiparous cases. The live birth rates were 85.1% and 82.7% respectively in primiparous and multiparous cases. The other complications like asphyxia and fetal distress were seen in primiparous cases. IUGR were reported in 12 primiparous cases, rest 8 cases were seen in multiparous women.
Table
Mean, SD of APGAR score at 1st minute of new born, t-value, d.f and significance level between primiparous and multiparous women in PIH group
Student’s t test is used to test the difference between the two means i.e. between primiparous and multiparous women. The mean APGAR score at 1st minute is 4.0 and 3.8 in primiparous and multiparous women respectively as show in table. This difference is not statistically significant.
Table
Mean, SD of APGAR score at 5th minute of new born, t-value, d.f and significance level between primiparous and multiparous women in PIH group
Student’s t test is used to test the difference between the two means i.e. between primiparous and multiparous . The mean APGAR score at 5th minute is 7.02 and 6.96 in primiparous and multiparous respectively as show in table. This difference is also not statistically significant. Here there is no difference between mean APGAR score of primiparous and multiparous .
Table
Mean, SD of birth weight, t-value, d.f and significance level between primiparous and multiparous women
Student’s t test is used to test the difference between the two means i.e. between primiparous and multiparous. There is no significant difference between the two means as show in table. The mean birth weightin primiparous and multiparous is 2.2 Kgs and 2.1 Kgs respectively.
Table: Type of PIH and its prevalence
Preeclampsia, eclampsia and gestational hypertension were seen in 21.3%, 8.7%and 0.88% of the PIH cases respectively as shown in table. Preeclampsia was found to be more prevalent when compared to other types of PIH.
Discussion
It was seen that the majority of the PIH cases went for caesarian delivery. The rate of caesarian delivery was (46.1%) followed by normal (38.1%) and induced (15.9%) deliveries. The results obtained in this study are in consistency with the data generated from other studies. A study was conducted at teaching hospital and also at few medical colleges in India to find out the major indications of caesarian deliveries. It was seen that PIH was one of the major indications of caesarian deliveries. Caesarian is the most common type of deliveries recommended in PIH. (7) . Here the rate of maternal deaths reported was higher compared to previous studies (0.816%).There was one (0.08%) maternal death in previous study (8) . As to the rate of caesarian deliveries in PIH cases, its frequency was slightly lower in present study than earlier study conducted (9). The rate of caesarian was 59.9% in this study done to see the case profiles of maternal mortality in Saul Paulo.The fetal outcomes seen in the study were live births (78%), still birth (18%), death (4%) in this study. The outcomes studied were low birth weight, pre maturity, still birth, low APGAR scores, deaths. The mean birth weight of neonates born to PIH cases was 2.1 Kgs. These results are in agreement with foetal outcomes seen in other studies. In a study conducted earlier to see foetal outcomes in PIH, it was seen that 19% of the cases had low birth weight (1). PIH is said to increase the rate of foetal deaths. (10) A study conducted to find the levels of serum lipids on PIH cases revealed that neonates born to PIH cases had lower birth weights than those born to normal ones. (6).The mean APGAR value was 4 and 6.41 at 1st and 5th minute respectively in present study. In a previous study conducted to assess the foetal outcomes in PIH, APGAR score was found to be greater than or equal to 7 at 1st minute in 84.1% of the cases and it was less than 7 in 15.9% of the cases .It was greater or equal to 7 and less than 7 at 5th minute in 99.2 and 0.8% of the cases respectively (1). The rate of cesarean section was higher in primiparous women. It is said that primiparous women were more prone to PIH(11). They had higher frequency of preeclampsia, eclampsia and gestational hypertension (95%, 98% and 98%). There are no many studies done to see the severity or effect of parity in PIH. . A study conducted to see the maternal and perinatal outcomes in eclampsia said that primiparous women were more prone to eclampsia than multiparous women. (12).There are many studies which say that primiparous women are more pone to PIH or any hypertensive complication than multiparous women.(12) (13).
In a study carried out to see the effect of smoking on PIH, it was seen that there was no variation in complications in both primiparous and multiparous women (14). Here there was no association between foetal outcomes and parity. Hence null hypothesis was accepted at P<0.05. But there was a strong association between maternal complications and parity. Hence null hypothesis was rejected at P<0.05. The rate of caesarian deliveries was higher in primiparous women. Two maternal deaths were seen in primiparous women. The other complications like asphyxia, IUGR and foetal distress were more prevalent in primiparous cases in present study.A study conducted to see the outcomes of PIH showed that there was no difference in caesarian rates in primiparous and multiparous women. (15) But perinatal death, foetal death on admission was seen mostly in multiparous and two foetal deaths were seen in primiparous cases during hospital stay. There was no difference in the means of APGAR scores of new born at 1st and 5th minute between primiparous and multiparous cases in the present study .The difference in mean weights of the neonates between primiparous and multiparous cases were also not very significant.Hence null hypothesis was accepted at P>0.05.Here preeclampsia was the most common type of PIH in the present study. Caesarian rate was higher in eclampsia. There was no much difference in foetal outcomes in different types of PIH. Caesarian is said to be the most common type of delivery in preeclampsia. Incidence of eclampsia was found to be 1.66% in a study conducted at Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (16). In the present study it was 5 times more than this. The rate of caesarian was 53.7% in women with eclampsia in previous study. In the present study it was found to be 52.2%. Maternal complications were more common in preeclampsic cases. Hence this data obtained is in agreement with previous study.
It was seen that the infant complications were more prevalent in preeclampsia than other types of PIH. The still birth of foetus was more common in gestational hypertension and preeclamsia. The death rate of new born was also higher in preeclamsia. Many complications and fatal outcomes were reported in preeclampsic women in earlier studies also. The low birth weights and preterm births were higher in preclampsia in earlier studies (11) . In the present study preeclampsic women were more prone to various complications as in previous studies (17). PIH may head to severe complications in later life. It is found to be associated with coronary heart disease in later stages of life in women with PIH. Hence necessary steps have to be taken to ensure proper diagnosis, care and treatment. This will ensure decrease in occurrence of PIH. The incidence of preeclampsia was 15% in previous studies (18). This is slightly lower when compared to incidence rate in present study. The rate ofmaternal mortality is high in developing countries due to poor socio economic condition. Improving standard of living might help to prevent these complications. PIH is the third most common cause of maternal death in developing countries. 68% of the total deaths due to hypertensive complications occur in South Asia. The prevalence of hypertension is 31.8% and 42.2% among males and females respectively (19). The maternal and foetal complications due to PIH, mortality and morbidity rates are lesser in developed countries due to appropriate care (1) .The proper identification and management of PIH, regular maternal and foetal monitoring will help in reducing the maternal and foetal mortality and morbidity. (12)
PIH is one of the leading causes of maternal, foetal mortality and morbidity. Hence there is a need for more researches and studies in this area. This study indicates that the prevalence of PIH is high in India. It has major effect on both mothers and new born. This study also recommends for a better maternal and foetal monitoring along with standard therapy as the lack of these have been reported to be the main cause of high prevalence. Hence this a study in this area would surely help in understanding the present situation of PIH in India. The higher rates of prevalence indicate the absence of standard antenatal and perinatal monitoring. Many government hospitals are providing treatment and medications free of cost. The prevalence of poor economic condition is higher in India. Hence cost constraints will not allow them to afford private hospitals. Hence they are devoid of a standard care and treatment. This case control comparative study gave an insight upon of maternal and foetal outcomes in PIH. The data generated in this study is in agreement with other studies. There are many studies conducted and being conducted in this area. This is one of the leading causes of maternal and foetal deaths in majority of the developing countries. The rate of PIH has reduced in developed countries due to proper precautionary measures taken during pregnancy. This study would help in understanding of loopholes in treatment, management strategy of PIH. This might also encourage others to conduct further studies in this aspect. This might provoke hospital administration and other authorities to take up necessary actions to prevent this raise in the incidence of PIH. Retrospective study was carried out due to time constraints. Non availability of adequate time is the limitation of this study. Other details of the patients like previous medical history and other complications present in women during pregnancy along with hypertension were not recorded in medical record for all cases.
Conclusion and future work
The present study shows that PIH is on of the major indication of caesarian section. It is one of the major causes of maternal mortality and morbidity. PIH was found to be associated with the larger number of maternal and foetal complications.This study talks about the most common maternal and foetal outcomes in PIH. However retrospective study was carried out mainly because of time constraints. The most common maternal outcome in the present study was higher rates of caesarian section in PIH cases. This is in agreement with data generated from previous studies. In addition to this there were maternal deaths and complications like PPH. The most common foetal complications were still births, deaths and low birth in the present study.There was a significant association between maternal outcomes and parity in PIH. But the association between foetal outcomes and parity was not significant. Preeclampsia was the most common type of PIH seen in present study followed by eclampsia and gestational hypertension. Caesarian was common outcome in all types of PIH. The rate of still birth was higher in preeclampsia even though it was common in all types of PIH.This study would help in understanding most frequently occurring maternal and foetal complications. PIH is said to be the one of the four main causes of maternal death in Brazil. (1). Hence conducting study in this area will contribute the better understanding of this aspect. These complications are fatal if not treated. Hence appropriate care must be taken to diagnose and identify PIH at initial stage and provide appropriate treatment. This would ensure the reduction in incidence of PIH. This would in turn reduce the rate of maternal and foetal mortality and morbidity. The rate of maternal mortality and morbidity due to PIH has reduced in recent years with increased care towards mothers and newborns and by providing appropriate treatment in US. The prevalence of PIH is found to be higher in developing country like India. This is due to the poor socioeconomic strata. This prevents patients with PIH from obtaining a proper perinatal and antenatal care. Proper maternal and foetal monitoring and a good management of hypertension with antihypertensive medication are recommended. This would bring down the rate of PIH in India.
Future work
There is a need for more work in this area as PIH is one of the most common disorders during pregnancy. If there was no restriction on time the present study could have focused on after effects of PIH by following up these women. There are many studies which say that these women are more prone to various diseases in later stages of their life. Hence this could have been possible if these subjects were contacted and followed up. Other areas like treatment or most common medications used in PIH and pharmacoeconomic study would have been conducted. Low socioeconomic condition is highly prevalent in India. Hence conducting pharmacoeconomic study will enlighten upon amount spent on medication and other economic aspects related to their treatment. PIH is highly prevalent in India. This can be attributed mainly to poor socio economic condition, lack of standard treatment strategy, lack of awareness of PIH among women. Hence a good standard treatment strategy and educating programmes for women regarding various aspects of PIH like diagnosis, treatment and prevention is needed.
References
1. Regina, S. Chaim P, Maria S ,Vasconcellos J,Oliveira D, Kimura A F .Pregnancy-induced hypertension and the neonatal outcome.Acta Paul Enferm.2008; vol 21, no 1, pp: 53-58.
2. Irgens H U, ReisÊter L, Irgens L M , Lie RT, Long term mortality of mothers and fathers after preeclampsia: population based cohort study, November 2001 ,BMJ ,Vol 323 , pp:1213 ,www.bmj.com
3. Book: Dutta; Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Text book of obstetrics in pregnancy; pp: 235-255
4. Rasmussen S, Irgens L M , Predicting Preeclampsia in the Second Pregnancy from Low Birth Weight in the First Pregnancy ,Obstetrics & Gynecology,pp: 696-700
5. Shen J. J., Tymkow C, MacMullen N, Disparities in maternal outcomes among four ethnic populatios. Ethnicity & Disease. 2005 vol 15,: pp:492-497
6. Mohanty,S., Nayak N, Nanda NN, Rao P.Serun lipids and malondialdehyde levels in primiparous patients with pregnancy induced hypertension. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, 2006, vol 21, no 1,pp: 189-192
7. Kambo I, X Bedi N, Dhillon B S, Saxena N C.A critical appraisal of cesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2002, Vol 79, Issue 2, November, pp:151-158
8. Lydakis, C., Obstetric and neonatal outcomes following chronic hypertension in pregnancy among different ethnic groups, 1998,Q J Med,vol 91,pp: 837-844
9. Leung, KY, Sum TK, Tse CY, Law KM, Chan MYM. Is in-patient management of diastolic blood pressure between 90 and 100 mm Hg during pregnancy necessary? June 1998 , HKMJ ,Vol 4 ,No 2 ,pp:211-217
10. KnightK B , Keith R E., Calcium supplementation on normotensive and hypertensive pregnant women, Am J C/in Nuir, 1992, vol 55, pp: 89l-895
11. Baulon.E, Fraser W D , Piedboeuf B, Buekens P, Xiong X. Pregnancy-induced hypertension and infant growth at 28 and 42 days postpartum. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2005:vol 5:no 10
12. Naib, J M., Siddiqui M L , Ajmal W. Maternal and perinatal outcome in eclampsia,a one year study. J pakmed ,2004, Vol 18 No 3 :: Page 470 – 476,
13. Badria, L. F, Amarin Z. O. Pre-eclampsia: is it a different disease in primiparous and multiparous women?. Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics :2005: 273(1): 26-31.
14. Yang Q, Wen S W , Smith G N, Chen Y, Krewski D,Chen1 X K, et al. Maternal cigarette smoking and the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and eclampsia, International Journal of Epidemiology, 2006, vol 35,pp:288–293
15. Hussein, M., Mooij J M V, Roujouleh H. Hypertension in Pregnancy: Presentation, Management and Outcome - A Retrospective Analysis of 135 Cases. Saudi journal of kidney diseases and transplantation, 1998, vol 9, Issue 4, pp: 416-424
16. Akinola O, Fabamwo A, Gbadegesin A ,Ottun A, Kusemiju O. Improving The Clinical Outcome In Cases Of Eclampsia: The Experience At Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, The Internet Journal of Third World Medicine , 2008: Vol 6:no 2.
17. Rasmussen S, Irgens L M. Fetal Growth and Body Proportion in Preeclampsia, Obstetric & Gynecology : Vol. 101, No. 3, March 2003,pp:575-583
18. Brown M. A, Buddle M L. Hypertension in pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes according to laboratory and clinical features.MJA:1996;vol:165,pp: 360-365
19. Mohapatra,S., Bulliyya G, Babu B, Mohapatra S, Nayak R.Health status of the elderly population among four primitive tribes of Orissa, India: A clinico-epidemiological study, Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2008 Apr 10